Background
In 2016, D.D., a military member with security clearance, was charged with domestic assault and disorderly conduct. The stakes were incredibly high, as a conviction could have jeopardized his military career, security clearance, and future. In addition, a no-firearms condition was imposed while the case was pending, further complicating D.D.’s ability to fulfill his military duties.
Challenge
D.D. faced serious charges that not only threatened his freedom but also his career and reputation within the military. The immediate challenge was to address the firearms restriction, which prevented D.D. from carrying out his duties. The long-term goal was to clear his name from the false allegations and ensure that his career, clearance, and rank remained intact.
Defense Strategy
Defense attorney Ryan Pacyga tackled the case in two parts. First, he filed a motion to lift the no-firearms restriction. Recognizing the importance of this issue for D.D.’s ongoing military responsibilities, Ryan successfully persuaded the judge to lift the condition, allowing D.D. to possess firearms while the case was pending.
Next, Ryan focused on clearing D.D.’s name by thoroughly investigating the facts of the case. He enlisted the help of a private investigator to interview both the alleged victim and a key witness. The evidence gathered during these interviews proved crucial in undermining the credibility of the allegations. Despite an initial plea offer to dismiss the domestic assault charge in exchange for pleading to disorderly conduct, Ryan rejected the offer and pressed forward to trial.
Outcome
One business day before trial, the prosecution dismissed the entire case. This result not only cleared D.D. of all charges but also preserved his military career, security clearance, and rank. Most importantly, D.D.’s name was cleared of the false and potentially damaging allegations.
Conclusion
In State v. D.D., Ryan Pacyga’s strategic defense resulted in the full dismissal of domestic assault and disorderly conduct charges. By successfully lifting the firearms restriction and conducting a thorough investigation, Ryan was able to protect D.D.’s career and reputation. This case highlights the importance of a comprehensive defense strategy, especially when a client’s livelihood and future are at stake.